Replies

"And? The dog is still inferior. not sure why you’d mention the simlarities as it goes right along with what I was saying"

How so? Dogs are much more successful then wolves. They have us humans running around catering to their needs by the millions. How is that inferior. You continue to make unsubstantiated claim after unsubstantiated claim. Just like KIND, unless you care to define superior and inferior your comment is meaningless.

"again speciation is not a problem for microevolution- You missed the point- please reread what I wrote."

Actually we are talking about different genera. So if you accept that foxes and dogs and wolves are the same "ilk" then you accept that evolution can produce different genera.

This is not a surprise since you already admitted to accepting that evolution can produce all the diversity of an entire family (bacteria).

"Yup they do, they are still a degredation from the original species no matter the survival rates."

That is another meaningless statement. There is nothing degraded between a wolf and coyote.

"I’m an ignoramus- I don’t understand that the overwhelming deleterious mutations far far outnumber the ‘neutral’ ones and severely hinder any attempts at new organ creation especially in light of of the"

I don't think you are an ignoramus, I think you are willfully ignoring the facts. You did it again by utterly ignoring my entire point about natural selection removing seriously deleterious mutations.

You pretend to respond and instead just repeat the same flawed argument.

"I’m not al lthat familiar with all the obscure classifications of Baraminology, and would need to take a long time looking all those up- tracing down lineages"

How would you even start? There is nothing in Baraminology that provides a rule for how to apply it.

[[How so? Dogs are much more successful then wolves. They have us humans running around catering to their needs by the millions. How is that inferior.]]

And so the silly little symantics game continues-

The Dog is genetically less pure, more prone to problems, and them ore hte dog is selectively bred, the more gentic problems crop up- any more questions?

[[This is not a surprise since you already admitted to accepting that evolution can produce all the diversity of an entire family (bacteria).]]

I did? Speaking for me now are ya?

[[That is another meaningless statement. There is nothing degraded between a wolf and coyote.]]

Oh really? See above explanation.

[[I don’t think you are an ignoramus, I think you are willfully ignoring the facts. You did it again by utterly ignoring my entire point about natural selection removing seriously deleterious mutations.]]

You obviously missed hte entire point which DID concider and answer the removal issue- so careful who you’re calling ‘willfully ignorant’

[[How would you even start? There is nothing in Baraminology that provides a rule for how to apply it.]]

Really? huh- you musta missed that link I posted then

[[You pretend to respond and instead just repeat the same flawed argument.]]

Who’s doing what now?