Not quite sure why one would - it’s beyond the scope of evolutionary biology; a biochemist might be better equipped. I’m also not quite sure why you put quotation marks around the word “scientist”. But then I read your home page and realized you are a “lawyer”, so you don’t really know anything about “science”, other than what you’ve read in the “good book” (you know, the big black one).
I have already admitted that my background is not in science. I can tell whether something was an accident or whether it was planned. I find that there are to many systems in place that work together, within the universe, to have happened by chance. I just can’t understand why some people just want to devalue the miracle of life. If life is a fluke, not guided by any hand, then everything we do is of no significance. If life is a fluke where does natural law fit in? I am talking of course about the morality of most societies such as it is wrong to steal, kill, etc.?
You said to Dintre [[But then I read your home page and realized you are a “lawyer”, so you don’t really know anything about “science”, ]]
He doesn’t know anythign about science? And you know that how? How did you learn what you know?> By reading science articles and coming to an understasnding of CERTAIN issues that interested you- how do we know what we know? By reading science articles and coming to informed understandings of issues that interest us- One person has a degree, one doesn’t- but BOTH have read the same materials of interest, and BOTH have learned what htey know from others who wrote the articles- When one or hte other makes a VALID point- countering hteir VALID points by engaging in a petty off issue accusation that argues “You can’t opine here because you don’t have a degree” doesn’t cut hte mustard. Dmitry is asking a valid question- there have been NO life forms created by man or any other means for that matter that we can point to. Leave the snide arrogant remarks outside the forum