[[OK, so are you saying a KIND is the same things as a species? If so then I’m not sure what all the fuss was about.]]
Nope not at all- That is far too general- as the link I provided will point out.
[[There are quite a few examples of new species in historical times. Your claim that a species will never become a new species is just wrong.]]
See my above reply. Of course there are new species- Microevolution is a wonderful design- macroevolution is a far different matter, and KINDS can’t become NEW KINDS
[[Are literally introducing an agent of some kind that kicks wandering organisms back into their KIND corral? That may be the weirdest thing I think I have ever heard.]]
Lol- the cop is figurative- not literal- the cop represents biological limitations- not some independant ‘agent’. I’m not sure if you’re being funny or sincerely misunderstand what I’m saying.
I said: **species, as we are fully aware, can only be altered just so far because there are protections inplace on several levels,**
You asked: [[Umm. No, we don’t know that. Care to give a single concrete example of this novel system?]]
Just one? Here’s a couple- directed breeding experiments, radiation on fruitflies which mimicked millions of years of mutations (short generational life of fruitflies coupled with massive mutation causing radiation)
[[So why do they allow us to introduce genes from, for example a bacteria into corn? It seems we were able to get past the biology traffic cop and the caps with very little trouble.]]
The caps are still inplace, symbiotic systems are factored into species tolorance caps (caps isn’t hte ideal term- I had the right one last night- but now can’t recall it- but ‘caps’ will do for now- ANd don’t play goober and ask “Redsox baseball caps?”) Some symbiotic organisms are infact vital to survival- but mind you, symbiotic relationships do nothing of moving one species KIND to another NEW KIND.
[[And for that matter, what is it? Is it corn KIND or bacteria KIND?]]
Symbiotic relationship of two KINDS