Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
"You know full well what KINDS are"

No I really don't' and clearly neither do you or you would be able to define it.

"you simply dissagree that they are ligit"

I can't "dissagree that they are ligit" unless you tell me what they are. It's not a species, is it a genus, a family? Does it even correspond to Linnaean taxonomy?

"Buit alas, playing symantics is a fun way"

You can't play semantics with gibberish.

"Biology"

Actually biology says that it does. Really, go to a college and open a book titled Biology.

"The mean ole cop who doesn’t let anyone cross to the other side He’s the biological Law...man"

There is no Evolution Cop that I have ever seen proposed on either side of this argument. Would you like to define him while you're at it?

"All the steps are inplace for microevolution, but non for macroevolution. "

They are the same steps.

"The steps for macroevolution would be systems that didn’t have species specific caps on just how far their systems could be perverted without cokmpletely breaking down"

What are these caps of which you speak? Are they like the mean ol evolution cop?

"and it would need steps inplace to ensure that forced intrusions of non species specific instructions from other dissimiliar species through lateral gene transference would cause it to self destruct and burn out"

Most hybrids show an increase in vigor over their parents.
272 posted on 07/14/2007 10:53:38 PM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies ]


To: ndt

One more then I’m doen for night

[[No I really don’t’ and clearly neither do you or you would be able to define it.]]

You know full well there is no evidence showing a species becoming anyhthing other than it’s own KIND- the sparrow is always a sparrow- no matter how you alter it, it will always be a sparrow

[[You can’t play semantics with gibberish]]

No, but you can feign dumb and pretend a subspecies is good enough to count as macroevolution, and that is always fun.

[[Actually biology says that it does. Really, go to a college and open a book titled Biology.]]

I’ll let htis little jab slide for now.

[[There is no Evolution Cop that I have ever seen proposed on either side of this argument. Would you like to define him while you’re at it?]]

Why Soytenly: “All the steps are inplace for microevolution, but none for macroevolution. The steps for macroevolution would be systems that didn’t have species specific caps on just how far their systems could be perverted without cokmpletely breaking down, and it would need steps inplace to ensure that forced intrusions of non species specific instructions from other dissimiliar species through lateral gene transference would cause it to self destruct and burn out. Seriously, mutations are not the vehicle for evolution- lateral gene transference is the one hope for evolution ,but I msut caution, lateral gene transference has it’;s own set of impossible hurdles to cross.”

Mr. Biology Cop stands on the curb across the street and tells species to please hang back and not cross because they don’t have the necessary isntructions inplace to evolve while crossing over to another species KIND

[[What are these caps of which you speak? Are they like the mean ol evolution cop?]]

Yes and no. The caps, or limits to parameters, if you will, are biological roadblocks to a species moving beyond it’s own KIND. A species, as we are fully aware, can only be altered just so far because there are protections inplace on several levels, some at the molecular level, some higher, that prevent perversion beyond certain “Instruction parameters or limits” So yes, they do kind of act like the Bad ole Biological cop (ansd just for hte record, he’s a officer of biology, not evolution). But they are also different from the biology traffic cop. The biology cop needs to see a species present non species specific instructions that it got from another species KIND before he’ll allow the species to cross- the caps, or instruction parameters or limits, work a bit differently, they prevent the species from utilizing laterally transfered instruction from other different species KINDS, and perverting hte original species too far.


278 posted on 07/14/2007 11:30:44 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson