[CottShop]

[[There are many cases of speciation in recorded history. Culex molestus is a new species of mosquito that has evolved in modern times from Culex pipiens and is specifically adapted to the London Underground and plants commonly produce new species via polyploidy.

So if your not talking about species (and your not), what are you talking about?]]

Are you suggesting that new subspecies = new KINDS? (Oh yes, I know, I know, you’ll complain “What is KINDS exactly) Loss of information has never resulted in a species moving beyond anything but it’s own KIND- no record of it happening, no examples, no experiments to point to- nothing- we can argue symantics all day long and go round for round, but at hte end of the day- evolution can’t produce one single evidentiary example showing a KIND moving beyond it’s own KIND. We’re all well aware that speciation happens and that species can vary greatly- adaption is a wonderfully marvelous fact- but macroevolution on the other hand is nothing more than aN unsubstantiated, unproven hypothesis

[ndt]

"Are you suggesting that new subspecies = new KINDS?"

No.

"Oh yes, I know, I know, you’ll complain “What is KINDS exactly"

That's not complaining, unless you want to define your words then intelligent conversation is impossible. Using words that have no meaning is called babbling.

"evolution can’t produce one single evidentiary example showing a KIND moving beyond it’s own KIND"

You're babbling. Define your words or you make no sense. You might as well say one garphalsnap never becomes a different garphalsnap.

"We’re all well aware that speciation happens and that species can vary greatly"

Since you appear to accept all the basic mechanics of evolution, then you need to propose a process that stops evolution from crossing he genus barrier.

Otherwise it's like saying you can put one foot in front of the other and walk down the street, but it impossibles to cross town. What stops it?