Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman

“Yeah, that’ll help this country compete worldwide. What a joke!”

I bet the Darwinian-urge to non-sequtier is more damaging to the economy than believing in the bible.

I’m a computer programmer... can you please tell me how my view of life’s origins contributes to my computing skills?

In fact , because I’m a programmer and I know if i type one single character wrong, my software won’t function... yet i’m expected to believe that something as complicated as the biochemical software that is DNA sprang up spontaneously from nowhere.. that is like asking for something like Windows Vista to have naturally evolved.

What’s more complicated.. DNA or Microsoft code?


14 posted on 07/14/2007 11:16:56 AM PDT by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: pacelvi
"What’s more complicated.. DNA or Microsoft code?"

I think the more important question is which contains more junk left over from previous versions, and that is a close call.
16 posted on 07/14/2007 11:20:49 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: pacelvi
I’m a computer programmer... can you please tell me how my view of life’s origins contributes to my computing skills?

You better stick with computer programming.

The theory of evolution has nothing to do with life's origins, only how genomes have changed since life began.

19 posted on 07/14/2007 11:23:31 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: pacelvi
Sorry, I had to get the joke in first :)

"I’m a computer programmer... can you please tell me how my view of life’s origins contributes to my computing skills?"

First, the origin of life is not the ToE. Second. I'm also a computer programmer and due to the nature of some of my past projects (bioinfomatics) an understanding of the ToE was critical. So it depends on what you do specifically.

"In fact , because I’m a programmer and I know if i type one single character wrong, my software won’t function."

Would that be the case if you wrote in a language that only had 4 characters and 64 words all of which only contained 3 letters? Almost any error you could make would end up producing a valid word.

"yet i’m expected to believe that something as complicated as the biochemical software that is DNA sprang up spontaneously from nowhere"

Nobody says spontaneously, it "sprang up" from previous versions of similar "software". WARNING: we am in danger of using a poor analogy to the point of just being wrong.
23 posted on 07/14/2007 11:28:29 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: pacelvi
What’s more complicated.. DNA or Microsoft code?

Which crashes more frequently?

131 posted on 07/14/2007 2:43:01 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: pacelvi

“...I know if i (sic) type one single character wrong...”

LOL


290 posted on 07/15/2007 7:37:57 AM PDT by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson