Replies

No, the frevo told the creationist scientist that they didn't know what a theory was because of the stand on the ToE.

"How would the non-scientist even know what HE was talking about?"

You didn't answer the question.

You've had numerous scientists here and you (personally) told them all they were wrong.

Oh I have? ALL of them? Please provide the evidence.

So, what exactly is your background metmom?

BA in Meteorology, which you knew already because I've made no secret of it. I also have some college level biology.

And for the record, I'm still waiting for your evidence or prediction.

It's up to the person setting forth the theory to establish what it is that will falsify it. That would be Darwin's responsibility. Or are you going to change the rules of the game?

"No, the frevo told the creationist scientist that they didn't know what a theory was because of the stand on the ToE."

Well I'm not sure who you are referring to then but as you word it that would be wrong.

"You didn't answer the question."

It would depend on the person. I've met self taught people that out shined the trained, it's very case specific.

"Oh I have? ALL of them? Please provide the evidence."

OK, so your going to take the absolutist approach. Fine, not ALL but many. Many members DC are trained scientists and you have butted heads with most. Hell Coyote is on this very thread.

"BA in Meteorology, which you knew already because I've made no secret of it. I also have some college level biology."

Actually I didn't know that. Not that you were suggesting it was, but meteorology is not a related field so your background on the topic is "some college level biology" which all collage students/graduates would have. It is you who are contradicting the vast majority that have specific training the the field.

"It's up to the person setting forth the theory to establish what it is that will falsify it. That would be Darwin's responsibility. Or are you going to change the rules of the game?"

And I'm asking you to support your hypothesis which I've never heard you state exactly. You seem more interested in tearing down the ToE then proposing an alternate. So what do you believe, what is your alternate?

FYI will be gone a few hours so take your time.

“BA in Meteorology...”

A BA? That seems odd; I would have thought that field would generate a BS (accept perhaps for those studying to enter the television weatherman market). But that said, surely with any degree in meteorology you understand the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the concepts of open and closed systems; I can’t imagine what could be more fundamental to forecasting. Why don’t you take a moment and explain to your fellow ID advocates that when they use this as evidence of their positions, they are barking up the wrong tree?