To: DocCincy
Sadly, around here, if one doesn’t toe the party line concerning the ToE, then one is labeled as not being a *real* scientist. It’s become a litmus test of sorts.
If one does accept the ToE, then it appears to give one the right to pass judgment on all scientists regardless of whether the one doing so has ANY kind of background in science at all, either by education or job experience.
It’s simply the acceptance of the ToE that makes the difference.
114 posted on
07/14/2007 1:54:14 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
"Its simply the acceptance of the ToE that makes the difference."
Not at all. It's the adherence to the scientific method. If anyone would care to present evidence or make a testable prediction they are welcome to do so.
What evidence would like to present or prediction would you like to make that either falsifies the ToE or provides evidence for whatever your belief is?
To start, you need to clearly and succinctly state your hypothesis because I have no idea what you believe.
119 posted on
07/14/2007 1:59:43 PM PDT by
ndt
To: metmom
I know that I have read a few testimonies from biologists that have renounced their belief in Evo and now are firmly in the creationist camp. Their reason for their conversion was that the more they kept digging the more the evidence pointed to an Intelligent Creator.
I wish I could find those testimonies.
132 posted on
07/14/2007 2:44:37 PM PDT by
Dmitry Vukicevich
(No one in my family tree was ever a monkey!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson