Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

Juanita Broaddrick tells a compelling story.

And just in general, on sex harrassment type issues, these Democrats are so selective in their outrage. Remember the Clarence Thomas hearings? Democrats were outraged. Yet all of the various allegations against Bill Clinton are of no concern to Democrats. why?


5 posted on 07/13/2007 9:02:26 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Show trial and as NOW said, Clinton had the right position on abortion.


75 posted on 07/13/2007 10:41:25 PM PDT by weegee (If the Fairness Doctrine is imposed on USA who will CNN news get to read the conservative rebuttal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Remember the Clarence Thomas hearings? Democrats were outraged. Yet all of the various allegations against Bill Clinton are of no concern to Democrats.

Yep, Bill Clinton broke his wedding vows, just can’t seem to foresake others for his wife.


98 posted on 07/13/2007 11:31:55 PM PDT by Son House ( Democrats are Hostile to Tax Payers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego; doug from upland; All
Yet all of the various allegations against Bill Clinton are of no concern to Democrats. why?

Why?

Other than . . . because they are traitorous, duplicitous; they are demonized liars from hell; they are globalist tyrant power mongers; they are vacuum headed idiots from philosophically ingrown syphlitic dunderheaded parents; they have more corruption money than brain cells; they are moral equivalents to slug slime in a Tiajuana brothel; they are spacier than the 3 butt wide fart flingers from the Feringee home world; they are dirtier than Al Capone's used toilet tissue; they are more maniacally Machiavellian manipulaters and enslavers than Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, Arafart at heart and in public as soon as they can pull it off . . .

Why--Other than all that . . . you mean?

119 posted on 07/14/2007 3:42:33 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Also Juanita Broaddrick is a Democrat and has no reason to lie.


149 posted on 07/14/2007 6:48:07 AM PDT by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
And just in general, on sex harrassment type issues, these Democrats are so selective in their outrage. Remember the Clarence Thomas hearings? Democrats were outraged. Yet all of the various allegations against Bill Clinton are of no concern to Democrats. why?

Excellent point. Dems seem to think allegations of sexual harassment against Thomas, including "a pubic hair in a coke bottle" comment warranted against confirmation of Thomas as a Supreme Court justice, yet Bill Clinton's numerous sexual crimes should just be dismissed. Can anyone imagine such accusations against Bush? Libs think they want impeachment now without so much as a high crime or misdemeanor, my gosh, their heads would be spinning.

172 posted on 07/14/2007 7:12:05 AM PDT by Proudcongal (One cannot have an understanding of or respect for the U.S. Constitution and be a leftist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
, these Democrats are so selective in their outrage

Sure they are. Just look at the difference in coverage in Mark Foley and Dave Vitter, compared to the mayors of LA and SF. How about Tom Delay and Jefferson, D- LA?

200 posted on 07/14/2007 8:56:01 AM PDT by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

“And just in general, on sex harrassment type issues, these Democrats are so selective in their outrage. Remember the Clarence Thomas hearings? Democrats were outraged. Yet all of the various allegations against Bill Clinton are of no concern to Democrats. why?”

Democrats don’t get outraged. They fake outrage and they are very good at it.

It has nothing to do with personal conduct. The only thing that that concerns them is defeating conservatives by any means possible and promoting liberalism. They are evil people.


282 posted on 07/14/2007 7:19:42 PM PDT by upsdriver (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It always comes down to the abortion issue. Clarence Thomas was correctly seen as someone whose instincts were pro-life, whereas Clinton could be counted on to select pro-abortion judges...so his personal conduct had to be overlooked.


306 posted on 07/15/2007 11:29:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Juanita Broaddrick tells a compelling story.

Lisa Meyers, who interviewed her for NBC, said there was a delay putting Broaddrick's story on because "you're too credible."

366 posted on 07/17/2007 2:53:00 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson