Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: untrained skeptic
“If what she says is true, then the only evidence the prosecution is presenting of a crime is the testimony of a witness that admits she was too drunk to remember the incident clearly.”

How do you know? There could be all sorts of evidence. What was their relationship? If they hated each other, it’s a pretty good bet she wouldn’t have consented no matter how drunk she was. Likewise, what did the physical examination show? If there was trauma, it is also unlikely that she had consented. No one consents to sex that is painful or injurious.

We don’t know what kind of evidence there may or may not be. Trying to prove innocence or guilt based on a newspaper account is pointless.

66 posted on 07/13/2007 12:05:19 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: monday

BINGO


75 posted on 07/13/2007 1:00:55 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson