Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Idaho Whacko
“You agree with the judge that the accuser and witnesses cannot use certain words? The judge is a tyrant, and you are nuts. People are entitled to speak freely in court, and judges who restrict that are not fit to serve. People swear to tell the whole truth, and have the right to do so. How can they do it if the judge makes sure that the jury is spoonfed only what the judge want’s them to hear?”

In fact, judges do this sort of thing all the time. One of the major powers they exert is on what evidence may or may not be heard in court. In a recent 2nd amendment case, the judge ruled that the person being prosecuted could not testify because he would claim the defense that the law was unconstitutional.

51 posted on 07/13/2007 9:31:11 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Exactly, and that is unconstitutional and tyrannical of the judge.


54 posted on 07/13/2007 9:36:56 AM PDT by Idaho Whacko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson