Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clara Lou

Did I say anything about his voting? Well yes I did on our last thread. That is: Voting for restrictions on abortion does NOT make someone pro-life, especially if you are pro-choice as Fred was at least thru the 1996 election.


160 posted on 07/13/2007 12:04:07 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: pissant

Email from the National Right to Life Committee (Fred alert!)
National Right to Life Committee | July 8, 2007 | Karen Cross

Posted on 07/13/2007 12:23:28 PM CDT by Sturm Ruger

It appears that there is an attempt to create confusion regarding former Senator Fred Thompson’s pro-life position.

You can go to National Right to Life’s website to see Senator Thompson’s voting record against abortion, euthanasia, and experimentation on unborn babies’ bodies. As you can see, Senator Thompson had an excellent pro-life voting record while in the U.S. Senate.

I am concerned that someone may be misleading you about his record. Regardless, I assure you it was not from National Right to Life. National Right to Life PAC supported Senator Thompson for the U.S. Senate in 1994 and 1996, and considered him to be a very pro-life Senator.

Senator Thompson has since reaffirmed his pro-life position. I am attaching a link to the statement he made to the National Right to Life Convention:

Fred Thompson’s statement to the National Right to Life Convention

Thank you for your interest and concern on this critical issue.

Sincerely,
Karen Cross
Political Director
National Right to Life Committee
512 10th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004


163 posted on 07/13/2007 12:17:35 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Fred Thompson, '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: pissant
National Right to Life PAC supported Senator Thompson for the U.S. Senate in 1994 and 1996, and considered him to be a very pro-life Senator.[from the email I posted above]

This excerpt seems to be in conflict with your comment in post #160: especially if you are pro-choice as Fred was at least thru the 1996 election.

164 posted on 07/13/2007 12:21:59 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Fred Thompson, '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

To: pissant; Sturm Ruger
Yo! Pissant--Can you explain why National Right to Life supported Thompson in '94 and '96, if your statement--if you are pro-choice as Fred was at least thru the 1996 election-- is true? Are you a liar? Or is National Right to Life deceiving us and supportive of pro-choice candidates for senate?
168 posted on 07/13/2007 12:35:47 PM PDT by Clara Lou (Fred Thompson, '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson