[maine-iac7]

HISTORY: Will still focus on major events in Britain, Europe and the world, including both world wars

How can you teach about WW11 and not include Churchill???

[Stoat]

HISTORY: Will still focus on major events in Britain, Europe and the world, including both world wars

How can you teach about WW11 and not include Churchill???

My guess would be that any remaining 'instruction' pertaining to WW2 would be couched in the notion that Great Britain was a co-aggressor and was ultimately responsible for the conflict, just as the Socialist idiots over on this side of the pond would prefer that people blame the United States (and President Bush, but of course not Clinton, Carter, etc. ) for 9/11 and the War On Terror (although of course they would prefer that the term " war on terror" not be used and instead be replaced with "The Glory Of Islam's Rise And Justified Defense Against Aggressor Nations")

HISTORY: Will still focus on major events in Britain, Europe and the world, including both world wars

How can you teach about WW11 and not include Churchill???

[singfreedom]

How would you teach WWII WITHOUT teaching about HITLER? This is remarkable. England, one of the countries with the richest history in the world, has opted to “shorten” their history by leaving out half of it?? Remarkable.

[reg45]

How can you teach about WW11 and not include Churchill???

Because Winston Churchill was not involved in World War eleven.

[F-117A]

How can you teach about WW11 and not include Churchill???

They can now concentrate on that great statesman Neville Chamberlain!

/sarcasm>

[Petronski]

How can you teach about WW11 and not include Churchill???

Well, probably because world war eleven is an event of the distant future.