...and he's not saying that no one should question his data, noone should attempt to repeat his experiments. Rather, that he believes they are eminently replicable...and that no other reasonable interpretations are possible.
He doesn't realize the power of "unreasonable" interpretations when economic interests are at stake, when ideology is questioned.
He said, “This should settle the debate.”
There’s no question what he’s saying, and it ain’t what you’re saying he’s saying.