Actually, from what the article says, the article IS accurate....it’s the conclusions drawn FROM the article that’re incorrect....inarguably incorrect.
It just doesn’t say what “they” think it says...just like everything else “they” look at and translate incorrectly. IT never says what “they” think it says....only what “they” WANT it to say.
All it’s saying is tht there’s more of a difference between humans and chimps than the simple 1% difference in DNA sequences....that there’s more to the story than the 1%...and there is.
Wow...such insight...we don’t know everything and there’s more to the story. I smell a research grant...
Right.
Its been fascinating to watch these past few years, particularly those folks who know very little about science but who are sure its all wrong because it neither confirms nor conforms to their religious beliefs.
The attacks they make on science are ridiculous to those who actually know something about science.
One of my fields is radiocarbon dating and its really interesting the distortions, misrepresentations, quote mines, and fabrications that the creationist websites try to pass off as science. And then posters from here visit those sites and try to pass their silly stuff off as "proof" that evolution didn't happen.