Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wiseghy

Exactly. My concern (and all free people’s concern) is that the Gubmint has no hope of reducing health care costs on the supply side.

It appears that they are reaching for straws and trying to reduce health care demand by cajoling, coercing, nagging people to take better care of themselves through increasingly draconian measures.


8 posted on 07/10/2007 10:18:34 AM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Eric Blair 2084
Exactly.

Polls show that voters favor plans that encourage “wellness”.

Polls also show strong opposition to plans which increase taxes, reduce choice and access to care, etc.; basically, any real restraint on supply or increase in gov. funding.

This is why nearly all “reform” initiates in MA, and proposed elsewhere, skip the cost containment aspect and focus ONLY on “mandating” coverage and access.

The existing safety net is a hodge-podge of state and federal programs, and is VERY poorly communicated and administered by the government. It is a direct reflection of the (mostly liberal) political interest groups that created it. Smart reform is possible, but government will need to go the industry and distributors, instead of insisting on micro managing every part of healthcare through programs and NGO's.

14 posted on 07/10/2007 10:47:09 AM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson