To: WOSG
This is the kind of judicial activist reading of the 14th that gave us Roe v Wade in the first place. It’s wrong, a bad reading of the Constitution that no Federal Judge, including Scalia, would go along with. Are you Robert Bork?
926 posted on
07/10/2007 9:50:18 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(The Reagan Platform: Unborn babies are PERSONS, and therefore are protected by the 14th Amendment)
To: EternalVigilance; WOSG
Are you Robert Bork? I'm with WOSG on this one. I believe you have the right goal, but have selected the wrong means. The unintended consequences (of a 14th Amendment ruling precluding abortion upon the basis of deprivation of due process) have frightful implications which I would prefer to discuss at some other time.
942 posted on
07/10/2007 10:05:20 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Duncan Hunter for President)
To: EternalVigilance
“Are you Robert Bork?”
No, but I can play him on FR. :-)
I know what he would say about such ideas, viz. “The Tempting of America.”
Tell you what, why dont you get the one Freeper who *is* qualified to tell us whether something rally would pass legal muster as a constitutional interpretation - Cong Billybob, who’s been in front of the Supreme Court.
Run it by him. It’ll be fun to watch.
943 posted on
07/10/2007 10:06:20 PM PDT by
WOSG
( Don't tell me what you are against, tell me what you are FOR.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson