To: pogo101
Im fairly sure Thompson voted to convict on one or more charges and to acquit on one.
Any source?
Even if true, the failure of the republican senate to force clinton from office for political reasons is more than enough to eliminate each one individually from further political consideration.
IMHO
91 posted on
07/10/2007 10:01:07 AM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: WhiteGuy
Even if true, the failure of the republican senate to force clinton from office for political reasons is more than enough to eliminate each one individually from further political consideration.Gawd, that is one of the dumbest things I have ever seen on FR.
It takes a 2/3rds vote to remove from office.
Now show us where the Senate GOP had a supermajority.
At the end of the day, Slick was not removed from office because the Dems refused to vote to do such.
97 posted on
07/10/2007 10:02:59 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
To: WhiteGuy
Just a quickie from Wiki:
On February 12, 1999, the Senate voted on the Clinton impeachment. Thompson voted "not guilty" on article 1, the perjury article, but voted "guilty" on article 2, the obstruction of justice article. The Senate's vote was 45-55 on perjury and 50-50 on obstruction. Conviction on impeachment charges requires the affirmative votes of 67 senators.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Thompson
101 posted on
07/10/2007 10:03:53 AM PDT by
pogo101
To: WhiteGuy
Even if true, the failure of the republican senate to force clinton from office for political reasons is more than enough to eliminate each one individually from further political consideration.
How illogical can one person be?
114 posted on
07/10/2007 10:07:29 AM PDT by
Clara Lou
(Fred Thompson, '08-- imwithfred.com)
To: WhiteGuy
ANY SOURCE?
You’re fracking kidding me, right? You’re willing to dismiss every member of the US Senate who voted in the Clinton trial for failing to remove him from office but you don’t know how to look up Senate votes?
Dear Lord in heaven.
116 posted on
07/10/2007 10:07:59 AM PDT by
brothers4thID
(FDT: "Every notice that while our problems are getting bigger, our politicians are getting smaller?")
To: WhiteGuy
124 posted on
07/10/2007 10:10:52 AM PDT by
perfect_rovian_storm
(Well Fred’s got a 60-40 lead. I intend to change that -- pissant)
To: WhiteGuy
pogo101 is correct. Thompson voted to convict on the obstruction of justice clause. He felt the perjury charge was weak. (perjury is alway hard to convict on)
732 posted on
07/10/2007 6:05:23 PM PDT by
babygene
(Never look into the laser with your last good eye...)
To: WhiteGuy
Which would have given us President Gore for 6 years at least. I don’t need to say more.
781 posted on
07/10/2007 7:15:18 PM PDT by
beckysueb
(Pray for our troops , America, and President Bush)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson