To: brothers4thID; EternalVigilance
I think the whole point is that EV wants FThompson to make an unequivocal statement:
Reporter: Senator Thompson, do you believe abortion is murder and should be banned in the United States?
FThompson: Yes. The first step is to repeal Roe V Wade, then I will work to promote an Amendment to the US Constitution to ban abortions in the United States.
Did I get it, EV?
399 posted on
07/10/2007 1:05:53 PM PDT by
jonathanmo
(No tag available at this time.)
To: jonathanmo
Pretty much. Although we do need a chief executive who recognizes and acts upon the unalienable rights of all persons, no matter what the other co-equal branch, the judicial, does.
But, in any case, Mr. Thompson has opposed a Constitutional Amendment all along. He has stated in the past he sees no need for a party platform, and he most certainly has not made any kind of unequivocal defense of the unalienable rights of the unborn or their personhood.
404 posted on
07/10/2007 1:11:34 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson