Skip to comments.
Banana Boobs as Darwin's Clock (a response "Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature")
FRED Columns ^
| July 8, 2007
| Fred Reed
Posted on 07/09/2007 4:46:53 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
To: org.whodat
Is fungi dating a tribe function? LOL There was a Peruvian mushroom that just couldn't get a date!
He just did not understand why, for all his friends said he was a real fun guy!
61
posted on
07/10/2007 7:23:03 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Tiddies....titties.....boobies.....bananas.....tubercles of Montogomery.......areola.......mams......
I was once told that a woman with large breasts invariably had areola like pie saucers....it put me off.....I have no theory to offer other than this guy who wrote this seems confused about much.
To: tupac
Care to refute any of his refutations? I mean other than by name calling.
63
posted on
07/10/2007 8:21:54 AM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: GodGunsGuts
I believe the concept of evolution and the Theory of Natural Selection are correct, as far as they go. They’re far from explaining everything about natural history, though, and some of these extrapolations of evolutionary thought are so extreme as to be laughable.
64
posted on
07/10/2007 8:31:20 AM PDT
by
-YYZ-
(Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
To: Texas Songwriter
"...I was once told that a woman with large breasts invariably had areola like pie saucers..."I refute your argument, kind sir, by offering up Scarlett Johanson as an example. She is pret' near a D cup, and yet has small areolas.
Areoli?
65
posted on
07/10/2007 9:24:23 AM PDT
by
-=SoylentSquirrel=-
(Nothing says impotence and inadequacy quite like a Muslim male)
To: RussP
I keep pointing that out, but not one devotee from the Church of Darwin on FR will respond. Gee, I wonder why????
To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
THe exception which prooves the rule.
To: -=SoylentSquirrel=-
I refute your argument, kind sir, by offering up Scarlett Johanson as an example. She is pret' near a D cup, and yet has small areolas. Not true, show pictures!! :)
68
posted on
07/10/2007 12:49:16 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: TalonDJ
What’s the matter? It was only “sarcasm”.
Refute? I just stand by the original article, written by educated professionals.
69
posted on
07/10/2007 1:07:09 PM PDT
by
tupac
70
posted on
07/10/2007 2:13:55 PM PDT
by
csense
To: tupac
Refute? I just stand by the original article, written by educated professionals.
Ah yes, when you can't refute and argument just mock those that put it forth. Great tactic when logic fails.
71
posted on
07/10/2007 5:13:08 PM PDT
by
TalonDJ
This big boob sag theory is differnt than the one I’ve heard. Basicly it was men like big boobs because they mimic the look of a woman’s ass. Bigger boobs are for sexually enticing men from the front and the ass from the back.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
