Skip to comments.
Banana Boobs as Darwin's Clock (a response "Ten Politically Incorrect Truths About Human Nature")
FRED Columns ^
| July 8, 2007
| Fred Reed
Posted on 07/09/2007 4:46:53 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
I can check out a redhead at nearly 2 miles without difficulty.
41
posted on
07/09/2007 6:55:33 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Shows you how much THEY know about evolutionary psychology...You could teach them a thing or two, I bet!
To: Psycho_Bunny
43
posted on
07/09/2007 7:08:51 PM PDT
by
sig226
(Every time I hit spell check, the fishies got all messed up. 'Bye fishies . . .)
To: editor-surveyor
etch them on stones?Where do you find the story on how to carbon date an etched stone??
44
posted on
07/09/2007 7:09:22 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Thats what I said. Childish.No doubt about it!
45
posted on
07/09/2007 7:13:37 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: dynachrome
It didn't say "with their grandmothers". I think the writer was implying (sarcastically) that younger Eskimo men can't tell the older women from the younger women.
To: editor-surveyor
Weren’t the Incas wiped out in Noah’s flood?
;)
47
posted on
07/09/2007 7:26:47 PM PDT
by
JHBowden
(Give peace a chance! Kill Terrorists!)
To: GodGunsGuts
Does that clock come with chimes?
48
posted on
07/09/2007 7:26:53 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: editor-surveyor
" For example, with the dinosaurs, catastrophism is plainly used, given an asteroid finished them off 63 million years ago" If they were finished-off 63M years ago, how did the Inca know what they looked like 1500 years ago to etch them on stones?
They didn't. That's a creationists' fantasy.
49
posted on
07/09/2007 7:38:03 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: org.whodat
"
Where do you find the story on how to carbon date an etched stone??" The dating was based on two separate concepts:
1. The Inca civilization.
2. The fungi that are found embeded in the scribing of real Inca stones. (there also are modern frauds manufactured for tourists to take home, that lack the fungi, and thus are able to make it through customs well enough to keep that industry alive)
50
posted on
07/09/2007 7:43:26 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: JHBowden
"
Werent the Incas wiped out in Noahs flood?" No, only the 'seed of Cain' and the seed of the Nephilim were.
51
posted on
07/09/2007 7:47:21 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: GodGunsGuts
"
I have a feeling we have not heard the last of his theory..." The end of his theory would also be a more complete end to the 'big bang' since they are dependent on the same run-out from a total black hole singularity. The difference in time (for an outside observer) 'earth-wise' from the initial run-out (in the beginning...) to the point where Humphreys' white hole begins (and the earth was without form and void) would be about a day to a day and a half.
52
posted on
07/09/2007 7:54:36 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: editor-surveyor
The fungi that are found embeded in the scribing of real Inca stones
53
posted on
07/09/2007 8:00:02 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: org.whodat
The fungi that are found embedded in the scribing of real Inca
Is fungi dating a tribe function? LOL
54
posted on
07/09/2007 8:04:14 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: org.whodat
No, it’s a governmental function to keep their antiquities from filtering out of the country.
55
posted on
07/09/2007 8:33:26 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
To: Beagle8U
Darwin was rejected by his peers as an idiot. Darwin’s theory of evolution is full of so many holes its ridiculous.
56
posted on
07/09/2007 8:57:22 PM PDT
by
mazza
To: GodGunsGuts
I just read this entire 36-page article. Most of it was excellent. It showed Dawkins for the charlatan he is. It also showed, however, that Dawkins believes that ID is fundamentally scientific. That may come as a surprise to many of the followers of his cult.
57
posted on
07/10/2007 12:00:05 AM PDT
by
RussP
To: GodGunsGuts
To: r9etb
Why does that woman have 5 yellow breasts on her head?I once knew a woman with 3 breasts!
Two were normal, but the the third was in the middle of her back.
Wasn't very pretty; but dang; she sure was fun to dance with!
59
posted on
07/10/2007 7:17:47 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Disambiguator
I think the writer was implying (sarcastically) that younger Eskimo men can't tell the older women from the younger women.They ALL look good 'round closing time!
60
posted on
07/10/2007 7:20:59 AM PDT
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson