Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: westcoastwillieg

You know what gets me about all this illegal talk, is NOBODY talks about Mexico getting ITS act together! All you hear about is the “US has to do this, has to do that” what about MEXICO? Just what the hell is going on down there?

I use to work with iilegal Mexicans about 17 years ago doing landscaping who told me it`s so corrupt down there, if you are robbed or if even a family member is murdered, you have to pay off the cops to have them do something. I assume this corruption is still going on? It sounds like an example of liberals running amok just like New York city here in the 1970`s.


7 posted on 07/09/2007 2:38:53 PM PDT by Screamname (On this date in history; Al Gore invents the Algorithm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Screamname
From an article on NewsMax that I received via e-mail today.

The national borders of the United States have been forever erased. While that scenario may sound far-fetched, critics of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) warn that future could be here sooner than anyone realizes.

President Bush, Mexican President Vincente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin informally agreed to set up the SPP in 2005.

Not so well known is the fact that supporters of the NAU concept slipped an initiative into the recently defeated immigration reform act. Largely unnoticed amidst the amnesty furor that ultimately sunk the Immigration Bill was the statement, "It is the sense of Congress that the United States and Mexico should accelerate the implementation of the Partnership for Prosperity to help generate economic growth and improve the standard of living in Mexico."

The bill called for measures to boost the economy of Mexico, including:

# U.S. support for Mexico, to strengthen its education and training programs. # A call for better health care for "poor and underserved" people in Mexico. # And U.S. assistance to "establish a program with the private sector to cover the health care needs of Mexican nationals temporarily employed in the United States." # The bill also called for U.S. assistance to Mexican businesses and government to eliminate corruption, which it termed, "the single biggest obstacle to development."

"This was the first attempt by the SPP to go public, and it failed," says Dr. Jerome Corsi, author of The Late Great USA. They thought nobody would notice. They were wrong."

Corsi called the sPP "a coup d-etat by bureaucratic means," adding that it works underhandedly like a shadow government.

"It is an attempt to turn North America into something like the European Economic Community," he says, "which began with economic cooperation and expanded eventually to include a common market, and then a full-scale regional government replacing, in many ways, the governing powers of the member nations."

20 posted on 07/09/2007 3:25:53 PM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Screamname
"...NOBODY talks about Mexico getting IT'S act together...."

Nobody except Fred Thompson. Excerpts from one of his Paul Harvey substitute commentator appearances:

" President Calderon doesn’t think much of our border policies. He criticizes our efforts to secure the border with things such as border fencing. He says that bottle necks at U.S. checkpoints hurt Mexican commerce and force his citizens to migrate illegally in order to make a living (and of course send money back to Mexico). He apparently thinks we should do nothing except make American citizens out of his constituents. .....

I think its time for a little plain talk to the leaders of Mexico. Something like:

"hey guys, you’re our friends and neighbors and we love you but it’s time you had a little dose of reality. A sovereign nation loses that status if it cannot secure its own borders and we are going to do whatever is necessary to do so, although our policies won’t be as harsh as yours are along your southern border. ...."

"My friends, it’s also time for a little introspection. ...you might want to consider your own left-of -center policies. For example, nationalized industries are not known for enhancing economic growth. Just a thought. But here’s something even more to the point that you might want to think about: What does it say about the leadership of a country when that country’s economy and politics are dependent upon the exportation of its own citizens?"

23 posted on 07/09/2007 4:20:35 PM PDT by cookcounty (Forgotten in the fray: Saddam killed, on average, 6,223 muslims per month, for 27 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson