Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Maintenance Hogs (A-10 Warthogs, that is)
Strategy Page ^ | 7-3-07 | Jim Dunnigan

Posted on 07/09/2007 4:37:25 AM PDT by Renfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2007 4:37:26 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Renfield

I remember, back sometime in the mid-to-late 70’s, just before the Warthog entered service, reading an article in Time Magazine that claimed that the Warthog was an expensive, useless boondoggle.


2 posted on 07/09/2007 4:43:43 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

A-10’s. The Infantry has a love affair with this old bird. Hope they hang around forever.


3 posted on 07/09/2007 4:43:50 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

What is “Time Magazine”?


4 posted on 07/09/2007 4:46:01 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (How do I change my screen name after Harper's election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Why don’t they build some new ones.I wish they would,I can’t envision a time when our troops woundn’t have a direct support aircraft available.


5 posted on 07/09/2007 4:48:41 AM PDT by Farmer Dean (If there's lead in the air,there's hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

$8million per plane for another 20 years of service isn’t expensive. I’d say it’s pretty inexpensive.


6 posted on 07/09/2007 4:48:45 AM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2007/q2/070629b_nr.html


7 posted on 07/09/2007 4:51:52 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Not to sound petty, but I would wager you could just such an article on every air craft and just about every new major weapons system ever developed. The point being that the lib media will ALWAYS try to undermine our military superiority.


8 posted on 07/09/2007 4:51:55 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Former Proud Canadian

Something to put in a bird cage if nothing else is available (and you don’t mind driving your parakeet insane).


9 posted on 07/09/2007 4:53:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Indianhead Division: Second To None!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
A-10 Thunderbolt

10 posted on 07/09/2007 4:54:13 AM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean
It’s a slow ugly jet - nothing a true fly boy would wish to be seen in.

In other words it’s not sexy enough for the big generals running the AF.

Of course they also don’t want the army to have “real” aircraft so they’ll kill off the A-10 and make the Army use UAVs for ground support.

11 posted on 07/09/2007 4:54:14 AM PDT by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
I think a new generation A-10 would be truly lethal.
12 posted on 07/09/2007 4:55:04 AM PDT by ChessExpert (Reagan deconstructed the Soviet Union)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570
But both the 'hawg drivers and the infantrymen love the beasts. Heck, even the Marine riflemen love 'em (but will never admit it)!

:-)

13 posted on 07/09/2007 4:59:45 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("How'd you get that scar, mister?" "Nicked myself shaving.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
It is one tough plane:


14 posted on 07/09/2007 5:00:24 AM PDT by Gamecock (FR Member Gamecock: Declared Anathema By The Council Of Trent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

It’s money well spent. I don’t want to be a ground troop on the wrong end of this flying tank, that’s for sure.


15 posted on 07/09/2007 5:04:28 AM PDT by WildcatClan (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

Do the right thing, for a change.
Transfer ‘em to the ARMY—give them a real aircraft that’s cheaper than a chopper.
Start building an improved Warthog II.
Give the Air Force a couple fewer toys, and give the US a plane we can USE—right now.


16 posted on 07/09/2007 5:08:15 AM PDT by Flintlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

ditto.


17 posted on 07/09/2007 5:10:28 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: em2vn

Bargain.


18 posted on 07/09/2007 5:13:51 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChessExpert
I think a new generation A-10 would be truly lethal.

Besides avionics they are already upgrading, what do you think would improve it's lethality?


19 posted on 07/09/2007 5:13:52 AM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

The fighter cadre runs the Air force. They do and always have hated the Hogs.


20 posted on 07/09/2007 5:15:12 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson