Perhaps the president, not Novak, is the one responsible for whether he was involved or not.
And again, Novak did reveal plenty in at least four columns on the subject, even while he was still keeping silent about specifics — if you bothered to read any of it, which I doubt.
You're very quick with the nasty put-downs, not too swift about how things work in this world.
I don't want the president getting involved in such cases--this one or any Democrat. You may like to live under a quasi-dictator, I do not.
I've followed this case quite closely, so please, keep your childish insults to a minimum and stick to the issue at hand.
Novak could have stepped forward and stopped this whole thing. He didn't. Instead he played coy.
You can defend him all your like. No one cares. You are under the delusion that you are the only authority on this topic. You are no such thing. You're merely a Novak water-carrier who would rather call people morons than admit that just maybe the one man who knew all the facts should have done more to prevent a prosecutor from going on a witch hunt.
Whatever you think, I don't really care. You show no particular insight into this story, only rudeness.