“if any mormon here claims they have been (to temple), while participating at FR- they are doing so under fraudulent circumstances”
There is nothing about participating in FR or communicating in any way non-members (even those hostile to the church) that requires a Mormon to embrace anything contrary to what the church teaches. I don’t even see what there is about the teachings or practices of FR that could be considered contrary to church. We believe in freedom of speech too.
“No, youve not truthfully answered or even attempted to answer any of my legitimate questions”
I haven’t followed your conversation, but not answering a question is not dishonest, neither is giving an answer you don’t happen to like or accept. I’ve never known resty to lie.
I attend the temple as often as circumstances permit, and I honestly don’t see any reason to consider my conduct here in violation of the standards required to be worthy to enter. Neither does my Bishop or Stake President. Your opinion to the contrary is meaningless.
ask her about the deception of her multiple screen names used in the religion forum
now you do
as for my questions - I havent seen any attempt at answering - let alone something I "dont like"
with regards to FR - Im interested how you legitimize the caveat under the guise of free speech and would remind you that this is not a free speech forum, rather a private conservative forum we are allowed to participate in.....That said - you are now an "affiliate with any group or individual whose teachings or practices are contrary to or oppose those accepted by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints", as there are individuals who would persecute you for your faith, malign the BOM, and / or Joseph Smith.....the website is called free republic - not free speech forum
you are decieveing yourself to consider otherwise
Beyond that, I was asking legitimate questions - perhaps youd like to address them ?
otherwise have a great afternoon