Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Largest Revolver in the world
Website ^ | unk. | PFEIFER ZELISKA

Posted on 07/08/2007 7:11:32 AM PDT by Revtwo

PFEIFER ZELISKA REVOLVER Largest Revolver in the world. 28 mm Mr. Ryszard Tobys revolver, a copy of the Remington model 1859. Length 1260 mm. Guiness Record Award in 2005


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: banglist; worldrecord
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

1 posted on 07/08/2007 7:11:36 AM PDT by Revtwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

Can it safely discharge a round?


2 posted on 07/08/2007 7:14:33 AM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
 

Probably not the best choice for undercover work......

 


 

 

 
 

3 posted on 07/08/2007 7:15:38 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

You should see the holster that comes with it. lol


4 posted on 07/08/2007 7:16:35 AM PDT by verity (Muhammed and Harry Reid are Dirt Bags)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

Something I don’t understand about revolvers. How do they get any muzzle velocity, when the gap between the cylinder and the barrel is a big leak for combustion gases?


5 posted on 07/08/2007 7:21:26 AM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

There is leakage, but the gap is only a couple thousandth’s, most proceeds up the barrel.


6 posted on 07/08/2007 7:23:04 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
The only reason I could picture for anybody NEEDING anything bigger than a 44mag would be camping in an area where there was a danger of being trampled by rhinos or elephants.

Nonetheless anybody who feels any sort of a real need for any such should consider the Wildey automags as an alternative to the super caliber revolvers. If nothing else, the auto mechanism will eat 40% of the recoil.


7 posted on 07/08/2007 7:23:07 AM PDT by rickdylan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

That still could not take down Rosie O’Donnell.


8 posted on 07/08/2007 7:23:16 AM PDT by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

That’ll make short work of any varmints, once I get a crane to lift it for me that is.


9 posted on 07/08/2007 7:24:49 AM PDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The guy really needs to get a better grip on that thing.


10 posted on 07/08/2007 7:25:03 AM PDT by Recovering Hermit (There's another old saying Senator..."Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
Actually its an 1858 Remington, not 1859.

And the correct name is 1858 New Army Remington. I have one, in .44 Caliber - it kicks a$$.

And in its day it was considered much better that the Colt's (1851 Navy or 1860 Army) due to its solid frame.

Of course James Butler Hickok (Wild Bill) would disagree as he used two .36 cal 1851 Navy's until the day he 'died' in 1876.

11 posted on 07/08/2007 7:25:43 AM PDT by Condor51 (Rudy makes John Kerry look like a Right Wing 'Gun Nut' Extremist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

It’s engineered to extreme tolerances. It’s like a hair wide gap.


12 posted on 07/08/2007 7:26:37 AM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Guy in the top picture:

Talk about a gun that kills at both ends!

The recoil would crush his skull.


13 posted on 07/08/2007 7:27:36 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rickdylan

Hey - this revolver looks like it would be perfect for plinking tanks and locomotives...


14 posted on 07/08/2007 7:29:03 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Those who "abjure" violence can only do so because others are committing violence on their behalf.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: verity

Is it like a miniature Howitzer?


15 posted on 07/08/2007 7:29:51 AM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: new yorker 77
That still could not take down Rosie O’Donnell.

(This response has been edited by the Admin Moderator to comply with Free Republic's ban on violence in posts)

16 posted on 07/08/2007 7:30:27 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

The 30 mm revolver mounted on the A-10 Warthog is bigger, but is even that the biggest?


17 posted on 07/08/2007 7:32:37 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
There is leakage, but the gap is only a couple thousandth’s, most proceeds up the barrel.

Yeah, OK, but I thought that the pressure in the breech had to go up to, I don't know, 5000 psi or something like that. Even a few thousandths would bleed off a significant piece of that. And the bullet has to be forced into the rifling, right?

18 posted on 07/08/2007 7:34:00 AM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Calculate the cylindrical area of the space versus the area of the base of the bullet as it proceeds down the barrel. Unless the powder burns so slowly that it is still combusting by the time the bullet passes the gap, 90-95% of the energy would be delivered to the bullet. Some loss, but not significant.


19 posted on 07/08/2007 7:36:41 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
Yeah, OK, but I thought that the pressure in the breech had to go up to, I don't know, 5000 psi or something like that. Even a few thousandths would bleed off a significant piece of that. And the bullet has to be forced into the rifling, right?

A few thousandths above Mach 1 is a brick wall.

20 posted on 07/08/2007 7:37:10 AM PDT by Gorzaloon ("Being Fat, Stupid, and believing in Global Warming is no way to grow up, Son.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson