Skip to comments.
Does the planet need this venture?
Nashua Telegraph ^
| 07/07/07
Posted on 07/07/2007 1:38:46 PM PDT by KevinDavis
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: swatbuznik; Potts Mtn. Pappy; Kevmo; wastedyears; dragonblustar; ssaftler; LucyT; Old Student; ...
2
posted on
07/07/2007 1:39:24 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: KevinDavis
Wahhh... I’m not given this for free, so is it really something the planet needs? Were Al Gore going up, of course, nothing would be said. Think of the pounds he’d have to shed though, to offset the carbon footprint of his launch.
3
posted on
07/07/2007 1:49:10 PM PDT
by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: KevinDavis
I haven’t been exactly up to date on this subject, but I haven’t heard anything about electromagnetic propulsion into space recently.
4
posted on
07/07/2007 1:52:24 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: KevinDavis
Gotta love the so called “progressives” who are all for anything that opposes actual progress.
5
posted on
07/07/2007 1:53:24 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: KevinDavis
The author of this op-ed whinefest is a simpering rectal sluice who should be strapped to the spaceframe of the next outbound launch vehicle. Snarky treehugger.
6
posted on
07/07/2007 2:07:33 PM PDT
by
Viking2002
(Fred in '08. Deal with it.)
To: kinoxi; All
7
posted on
07/07/2007 2:10:20 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: kingu; All
That is also how I see this article.. A whine fest..
8
posted on
07/07/2007 2:10:53 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: KevinDavis
Is there some fundamental issue that makes it unworkable? If it could be made to work the cost effectiveness would be extraordinary compared to the what we’re lugging up now.
9
posted on
07/07/2007 2:14:51 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: KevinDavis
Wow...this article is probably the dumbest thing I’ve seen all week.
And I’ve seen some dumb stuff on the interweb this week, let me tell YOU.
To: kinoxi; All
It is called developing new technologies and it is going to take awhile.
11
posted on
07/07/2007 2:18:12 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: Constantine XIII; All
It sounds like sour grapes to me. Basically I can’t go into space so others shouldn’t go into space.. It is also dumb also..
12
posted on
07/07/2007 2:21:10 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: KevinDavis
To answer the question, yes, the planet really needs this. There.
13
posted on
07/07/2007 2:22:00 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: KevinDavis
Maglev technology is next century? It was last century. Your sarcasm is dually noted
14
posted on
07/07/2007 2:23:27 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: KevinDavis
do we really need to unload more fuel emissions into the skies with tourist rockets Aside from whether this is a viable business idea, the amount of exhaust would be insignificant, as would the author of this question.
15
posted on
07/07/2007 2:34:28 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Right Wing Assault; All
In order for the human race to survive..
16
posted on
07/07/2007 2:40:41 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: KevinDavis
Basically I cant go into space so others shouldnt go into space.
Sadly that's the attitude. I wish I could go but I'm not a millionaire. However I do see those millionaires as my best chance of getting there in the future. Kinda like electric lights and indoor plumbing were once for wealthy people but those wealthy folks eventually put those things within reach of the average man.
17
posted on
07/07/2007 2:42:10 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
To: cripplecreek; All
That is true.. Air flight was once only for the rich, cars was once only for the rich.. It takes time for the price to come down.
18
posted on
07/07/2007 2:47:01 PM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Mitt Romney 08)
To: kinoxi
“...electromagnetic propulsion...”
Electromagnetic propulsion is for real. I know a group of engineers who know how, have done on a small scale, say it will work on a large scale. This can be accomplished w/o requiring any fuel - the energy is available.
To: GGpaX4DumpedTea
I see many benefits in exploring it. I was wondering why NASA doesn’t fund this along with the amalgamate of crap that is currently experimentally funded.
20
posted on
07/07/2007 3:00:12 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson