Here's a Link to a site listing many, but by no means all, the fossils believe to show aspects indicating transition from reptile to mammal, reptile to bird, fish to amphibian, etc., along with the reaons why it is believe to be a transitional fossil. Enjoy.
You link starts off with an apologetic for ‘types of transitions’ which are all based on a priori assumptions and no cold hard evidence- it then proceeds to list species KINDS that although they have a few similarities, are vastly different, and the claims are made that they are trhe same KINDS without any proof.
When one uses assumptions without genetic proofs, one can make any claim they like and call it science I guess.
For the truth on TalkOrigin’s article titled Transitional Vertebrate fossils and how they use major unsupported assumptions and call it science- head on over to http://www.trueorigin.org/isakrbtl.asp where you’ll find much science to refute the so called transitions used in TalkOrigins article.
“Advocates of evolutionary theory practice evolutionism when they routinely invoke (and dogmatically defend) naturalistic and humanistic philosophical presuppositions, and arbitrarily apply those presuppositions to their interpretation of the available empirical data.”
enjoy