Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
you made it sound like there were 300+ different species KINDS Ahayes, and that isn’t true

Yes, it is.

and it leaves out species who’s jaw variations show the bones moving the other way.

You realize accusing someone of academic misconduct without a shred of evidence is libelous? Fortunately the author doesn't care about your opinion.

I’d also be interested in seeing the PDF file posted here or a link to it.

I presented you with the reference and key summaries before. Are you admitting that you actually have no clue what the contents of the paper in question are? I mean, it's amply obvious that you're just making it up as you go along, but to admit that is another thing altogether.

In conclusion,

WHEE!!

353 posted on 07/18/2007 11:04:39 AM PDT by ahayes ("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]


To: ahayes

[[Yes, it is.]]

NO it’s not Ahayes- there are not 300 species KINDS and this is the main point I’m contending.

[You realize accusing someone of academic misconduct without a shred of evidence is libelous? Fortunately the author doesn’t care about your opinion]]

Yup- but hte fossil record will show species within the KINDS given as examples for the supposed evolution showing clear evidence of jawbone moving in the other direction- When a fact is infact factual- there is no need to worry- the fossil remains don’t lie Ahayes.

[[I presented you with the reference and key summaries before. Are you admitting that you actually have no clue what the contents of the paper in question are? I mean, it’s amply obvious that you’re just making it up as you go along, but to admit that is another thing altogether.]]

There was another reference which I followed and posted about showing 8 or so major species KINDS along with some references to subspecies within the same KINDS- then you come along claiming that all the species are related, and I’m telling you that there is absolutely NO proof that ANY of the species or even yea, the species KINDS are related- infact- there IS some evidence that they ARE NOT as the cynodont HAS NO direct predescesor- but that doesn’t stop the authors of the ear evolution chart from making hte claim that a rat sized species is related to the hippo sized Cynodonts? amazing- incredible- astounding!


359 posted on 07/18/2007 12:19:02 PM PDT by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson