Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dartuser
She has no business trying to do science; she has shown by her recent book that she is simply not qualified.

What exactly qualifies one to "do science?"

Simple; to do science one must follow the scientific method.

This is distinctly different from what lawyers do. The rules of evidence and the peer review process are two examples. Other differences are in the "judging" of evidence and the target audience.

Ann Coulter's recent book is a good example of how to be a lawyer or celebrity, but it is not a good example of how to do science.

259 posted on 07/10/2007 6:41:49 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
“Ann Coulter’s recent book is a good example of how to be a lawyer or celebrity, but it is not a good example of how to do science.”

Coyote, you are so full of crap its almost hard to believe. e.g. I know more about fitness nutrition than most so called experts in this field and I’m a network security engineer (also with a geo-chemistry background), so quit with the formal credentials BS in order to speak. Anyone smart enough to read, can understand that darwinism is crap.

282 posted on 07/12/2007 9:34:15 AM PDT by razzle (Liberal Science: Experiments on unborn babies, man-made global warming, and darwinism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson