Ichneumon- You’ve listed nothign that counters Ann’s assertion that there isn’t any proof for evolution- All you’ve listed are links to issues that are hugely debated and not clear examples of evolution at all. You folks accuse her of ‘parroting someone else’s propoganda’ and yet you throw propoganda right back at us as though you’ve taken the high road and don’t do the exact same thing? There is no evidence for amcroevolution- none. There is however plenty of evidnece for microevolution, which some propogandists will try to pawn off as being evidence for macroevolution.
Posting sad ad hominem attacks agaisnt Ann, attacks that are lacking in scientific substance, yet heavy on fluff isn’t very effective I’mn afraid.
It’s actually kinda laughable that folks present other people’s OPINIONS about issues as though their own biased opinions unproven by scientific ewvidences are any more credible than Ann or anyone else’s opinions on issues that haven’t been settled for 150 years now- You can post all the ad hominem attacks on Ann you like, and post nitpicking articles that avoid any real facts, but the plain fact is that macroevolution hasn’t been proven, hasn’t even been demonstrated, and is nothign but an opinion that has to be propped up by assumptions and guesswork because the scientific facts are completely lacking. Arguing that micreovultionary examples are macroevolution is nothign more than a a priori based opinion.
I’m sorry but even if Ann is right about evolution I wouldn’t want to be basing my beliefs on her arguments - nor would I want to refer to her at all. She shows a serious lack of judgment and wisdom by her lowbrow discourse.