[burzum]

I’m not going to tell you anything. That is your own job. I’m not your personal researcher. Evolution of the eye is justified and there is plenty of literature on the topic if you actually decide to read it rather than continue spouting your Creationism in this echo chamber. I’ll give you some hints:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_the_eye
What Evolution Is, Ernst Mayr (you can find it on Amazon.com)

[razzle]

I just read all your BS and it is unconvincing. Your reaction also shows you are clueless in how to defend your religion. But being the nice guy that I am, I’ll give you some free advice. Go out and read some more; try Darwins Black Box for starters.

[metmom]

What a cop out. The standard is that the person making the assertion is the one responsible to back it up, not to send someone chasing fairy tales. Creationists are regularly criticized for that very thing.

All you’ve done is demonstrate that you have no answer to that question, and that none exists.

Wikipedia? What a joke. You obviously need to also catch up to the fact that evos don’t consider that a reliable source.