8mm
Posted on 07/06/2007 7:14:45 PM PDT by monomaniac
LOL...it’s called “LifeSite.” Of course it is “agenda-driven.”
Like a stolen car in a chop shop, humans are worth more for their parts than as a whole.
Ping....
Lifesite.net? Doesn’t sound like a particularly reliable source,
___________________________________
Associated Press tells much the same story, but the story is the representations of the lawsuit. We have not heard from the doctor or witnesses yet.
Mrs VS
This sort of thing has been going on for years, and will only get worse. It’s been going on quietly, and is a big money business. There are plenty of books published about this topic, check them out.
Suit claims no consent to end of life: Mother says she never allowed Sierra Vista hospital officials to take son off life support
http://gr.acr.org/acr?action=viewNewsArticle&documentId=2c9e4f69139075440113922bac560083
“the story appears to have been hugely exaggerated”
What do you base that statement on?
Of course we have no idea yet whether it’s true.
“I cannot believe that the pjysician had such evil intentions.”
Really?
Evil doctors are nothing new
http://www.torontosun.com/News/Columnists/Worthington_Peter/2007/07/07/4320563.html
This LifeSiteNews piece is pretty straight-forward because all it really does is report what’s in the lawsuit. I have seen other LSN “news” stories that exaggerate, slant or make commentary. It’s fine to send out PR or commentaries, just don’t pretend they’re “news.”
************
What's wrong with pro-life organizations, exactly?
“As Shea explained, people can be brought back to life even fifteen minutes after their heart has stopped beating.”
Never say never, but I’d have to think this would be EXTREMELY rare. Four or so minutes is usually considered the outside for brain damage and seven minutes for severe brain damage. Reality is that only a small percentage survive cardiac arrest, even with immediate help.
“All this is probably more than most of you wanted to know about the harvesting of organs but it gave the family some solace to know that their beloved son did not live and die for no reason—many others live on because of all that they gave.”
Exactly.
Because in this case it looks like they’re in bed with the trial lawyers.
In what way?
If you can’t figure that out on your own, I believe we probably have no common ground on which to communicate reasonably.
They were holding diplomas saying MD but they were impostors. Those monsters were not, at any time, physicians.
I do believe you are correct. We have nothing in common.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.