My vote is Houston. Close to the border so they wouldn’t risk as much by trucking one over here. Very densely populated downtown during the workday. Prevailing winds would shower huge populated areas with radiation. There would be no escape on the roadways, as they can’t even handle daily traffic normally.
Houston would be a terrible choice for the “most bang for the terrorist buck”. There are 2 or 3 main work areas in Houston, not just downtown.
If they put it on a barge and floated it up any of the inland waterways such as the Mississippi, Tennessee or Ohio Rivers, the Muzzies could wipe out a city like Cincinnati or Memphis without much chance of being detected.
According to a friend who works on a tug boat that pushes barges up and down those rivers, no one is watching the cargo on barges at all. The river system is a huge security hole.....Chertoff, please answer the white courtesy phone....
The “American Hiroshima” plot, also known as “The Day of Islam,” is supposed to involve a simultaneous nuclear attack on seven U.S. cities:
New York, Washington D.C., Boston, Miami, Houston, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.
Our wide-open border with Mexico is our number 1 security threat, but our doofus president couldn’t care less.
Their choice is far more likely to be symbolic - hence the fascination with NYC and DC. Houston really doesn’t qualify there and neither, for the most part, would LA.