Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing wins $2bn contract to rewing A-10s
Flight Global ^ | 7/5/2007 | Graham Warwick

Posted on 07/05/2007 2:40:09 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Boeing has won a $2 billion contract to build new wings for the US Air Force's Fairchild A-10 ground-attack aircraft, after beating rival bids from contractors including Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman.

Announced on 29 June, the deal calls for the delivery of 242 replacement wing kits for installation by the USAF's Ogden Air Logistics Center at Hill AFB, Utah, with the work to extend the life of the A-10 fleet by at least 20 years.

More than 700 A-10s were introduced from 1976 and, despite regular threats of retirement, the type remains one of the air force's most effective close-air support platforms.

Lockheed is performing a wider precision engagement upgrade to the aircraft, and the resulting A-10C configuration will have new avionics equipment and an expanded range of air-to-surface weapons.

Boeing has yet to select its fabrication contractors for the rewinging project, which will begin with an 18-month engineering phase and is scheduled for completion by September 2018.

Boeing Macon will put the wing kits together for installation by the air force depot. The replacement design is based on the "thick" wing fitted to late production examples of the A-10.

Meanwhile, the USAF has awarded Korean Air a contract worth $16 million to continue service-life extension work on its A-10s until 2009. The company has previously modified 180 of the type at its Gimhae facility in South Korea.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: a10; aerospace; aviation; boeing; miltech; thunderboltii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: MarineBrat

What’s funny is that P-51 could outrun that A-10.


81 posted on 07/08/2007 7:48:42 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Alright!!!! This is fantastic!!


82 posted on 07/08/2007 7:55:39 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
The task of designing a whole new airframe and testing it, even if it is suppose to be the same, is almost as hard as doing it from scratch. It does not seem like it should be, but it is.

The Russians seem to be pretty good at it.

83 posted on 07/08/2007 8:20:19 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase
"What’s funny is that P-51 could outrun that A-10."

With superior firepower, only if the A-10 wanted it to. The Mustang is one of the most beautiful airplanes ever created...but so is the A-10. How can ANYONE think the A-10 is ugly??? (in my best Steve Irwin) She's a beauty!

84 posted on 07/08/2007 8:20:41 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith; BearCub

Maybe the Air Force holds the design patents....it was built to government spec’s


85 posted on 07/08/2007 8:28:28 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BearCub

I think I see your point, but let’s put this in more common terms. Are you saying that if you have a 30 year old Ford Mustang, then only a Ford dealer can work on it? Are you saying that only Ford can sell you parts? If you take it to someone other than Ford, are you in breach of contract or some law because you took your car to someone else? Can you buy aftermarket parts that improve the performance? At what point is it your car and you can do with it what you will?


86 posted on 07/08/2007 8:39:36 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BearCub

I am sure they are upgraded wings and you have to do to dodge a design copyright if there really is one is move around a rivet or two.


87 posted on 07/08/2007 9:06:37 PM PDT by appeal2 (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

It still burns me that the Air Force tried to first replace these with F-16s (”A-16’s...what a friggin’ joke), and now with Joint Strike Fighters. The Pentagon certainly has its share of fools.


88 posted on 07/08/2007 9:27:49 PM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traumer
Even GI Joe had its own versions...

89 posted on 07/08/2007 9:47:37 PM PDT by Little_shoe ("For Sailor MEN in Battle fair since fighting days of old have earned the right.to the blue and gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: traumer
Even GI Joe had its own versions of the good old A-10...

1984 Cobra Rattler


1988 Tiger Rat


1992 A-10 Thunderbolt

90 posted on 07/08/2007 9:50:56 PM PDT by Little_shoe ("For Sailor MEN in Battle fair since fighting days of old have earned the right.to the blue and gold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
Great news!!

And I remember just before the Iraq War 1 how these beauties were scheduled to be SCRAPPED in order to save costs for the upcoming more advanced aircrafts.

Now they are the frontline swords as they were destined to be used against the enemies.

91 posted on 07/08/2007 9:56:42 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic
And I remember just before the Iraq War 1 how these beauties were scheduled to be SCRAPPED...

Who knew that blasting people as they run around on camelback through the desert was about to become a primary role of the US Air Force?

In any case, the A-10 is suited admirably for the job.

92 posted on 07/09/2007 1:52:59 AM PDT by gridlock (Righty Tighty / Lefty Loosey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Could be — whatever the contract said.

As a consultant, certain things I produced belonged to my employer, some the customer and some myself.

We are speaking about “Registered Copyrights” here and there is a section on the Form TX, to identify the Copyright Claimants and a section for transfers.


93 posted on 07/09/2007 4:06:07 AM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: Ancesthntr
China ain’t going away, but these planes are one way of keeping them on their side of the ocean.

No it's not. They are incredibly useful, but only against 3rd world opponents.
95 posted on 07/09/2007 10:04:22 AM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Nice!! The keg-engines are a nice touch, and I’m sure they’re mileage boosters as well!


96 posted on 07/09/2007 3:40:53 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (When Bubba lies, the finger flies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
A 10 is a cool airplane, I'm glad it's getting new wings (that means it'll be around for quite a while.)

Unrelated, but still of interest...Why isn't the B-52 getting new engines? Seems to me that they could add range, speed reliability, and payload by converting to four, modern engines.

97 posted on 07/09/2007 9:15:50 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

Yeah the enemy can’t see which side is up. They should paint one on the other end so they can’t see which way it’s going either!

It’s an old Warthog running joke to talk about how slow it is. The pilots who fly them know them all and can tell them the best.


98 posted on 07/11/2007 12:18:34 AM PDT by zipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: zipper

Two jokes that I’ve heard about A-10s:

The A-10’s airspeed indicator is a pocket calendar.

The A-10 takes birdstrikes from the rear.

Of course, that is from F-16 guys whose brethren got their planes chewed to hell trying to fly the A-10’s mission. A few years back, some genius at the Pentagon decided that they could put 30mm gun pods on the F-16 and go hit tanks. It didn’t work worth a crap, the F-16 could not take the hits from ground fire and be survivable.


99 posted on 07/11/2007 7:22:58 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Sharpei diem -- Seize the wrinkled dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat
"Notice something interesting about the Warthog. It has a fake cockpit painted on its underbelly to help disguise its orientation."

The Canadaians started that with their F-18s. After someone in the USAF brightened up...we started doing it as well.

And I do not know if it is the same...but I have seen an all black A-10 two seater [test aircraft] with a clear canopy, used to display geared up, precision night attack variant. Dont know whatever came of it though...

100 posted on 07/24/2007 2:34:47 PM PDT by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson