Posted on 07/05/2007 2:40:09 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
What’s funny is that P-51 could outrun that A-10.
Alright!!!! This is fantastic!!
The Russians seem to be pretty good at it.
With superior firepower, only if the A-10 wanted it to. The Mustang is one of the most beautiful airplanes ever created...but so is the A-10. How can ANYONE think the A-10 is ugly??? (in my best Steve Irwin) She's a beauty!
Maybe the Air Force holds the design patents....it was built to government spec’s
I think I see your point, but let’s put this in more common terms. Are you saying that if you have a 30 year old Ford Mustang, then only a Ford dealer can work on it? Are you saying that only Ford can sell you parts? If you take it to someone other than Ford, are you in breach of contract or some law because you took your car to someone else? Can you buy aftermarket parts that improve the performance? At what point is it your car and you can do with it what you will?
I am sure they are upgraded wings and you have to do to dodge a design copyright if there really is one is move around a rivet or two.
It still burns me that the Air Force tried to first replace these with F-16s (”A-16’s...what a friggin’ joke), and now with Joint Strike Fighters. The Pentagon certainly has its share of fools.
And I remember just before the Iraq War 1 how these beauties were scheduled to be SCRAPPED in order to save costs for the upcoming more advanced aircrafts.
Now they are the frontline swords as they were destined to be used against the enemies.
Who knew that blasting people as they run around on camelback through the desert was about to become a primary role of the US Air Force?
In any case, the A-10 is suited admirably for the job.
Could be — whatever the contract said.
As a consultant, certain things I produced belonged to my employer, some the customer and some myself.
We are speaking about “Registered Copyrights” here and there is a section on the Form TX, to identify the Copyright Claimants and a section for transfers.
Nice!! The keg-engines are a nice touch, and I’m sure they’re mileage boosters as well!
Unrelated, but still of interest...Why isn't the B-52 getting new engines? Seems to me that they could add range, speed reliability, and payload by converting to four, modern engines.
Yeah the enemy can’t see which side is up. They should paint one on the other end so they can’t see which way it’s going either!
It’s an old Warthog running joke to talk about how slow it is. The pilots who fly them know them all and can tell them the best.
Two jokes that I’ve heard about A-10s:
The A-10’s airspeed indicator is a pocket calendar.
The A-10 takes birdstrikes from the rear.
Of course, that is from F-16 guys whose brethren got their planes chewed to hell trying to fly the A-10’s mission. A few years back, some genius at the Pentagon decided that they could put 30mm gun pods on the F-16 and go hit tanks. It didn’t work worth a crap, the F-16 could not take the hits from ground fire and be survivable.
The Canadaians started that with their F-18s. After someone in the USAF brightened up...we started doing it as well.
And I do not know if it is the same...but I have seen an all black A-10 two seater [test aircraft] with a clear canopy, used to display geared up, precision night attack variant. Dont know whatever came of it though...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.