Skip to comments.
S.F. incurs huge costs for public retirees : Governments begin to grapple with unfunded health care
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| July 5, 2007
| John Wildermuth, Robert Selna
Posted on 07/05/2007 11:51:15 AM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Just the beginning of this national unfunded mandate mess.
.
1
posted on
07/05/2007 11:51:18 AM PDT
by
george76
To: george76
2
posted on
07/05/2007 11:52:43 AM PDT
by
null and void
(A large gov't agency is more expensive than a smaller agency with the same mission, yet does less)
To: george76
They should just give them fair warning and whack retirement heathcare geez onbe is eligible for medicare at 65. It is their option to either stay working or pay their own healthcare. That’s real life. I say this as a wife of a government employee.
To: george76
"The $500,000 is a drop in the bucket to address the problem of our unfunded liability,'' said Phil Ginsburg, Newsom's chief of staff. If the 4.9B liability were a gallon bucket, 500K would be a third of a milliliter.
4
posted on
07/05/2007 11:55:31 AM PDT
by
wideawake
("Pearl Harbor is America's fault, right, Mommy?" Ron Paul, age 6, 12/7/1941)
To: george76
I sense a tsunami building for a federal bailout.
5
posted on
07/05/2007 11:55:36 AM PDT
by
AU72
To: george76
So I guess funding weenie replacements wasn’t such a good idea?
6
posted on
07/05/2007 11:56:15 AM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: george76
Note to liberals in SF (& elsewhere): The bills must be paid eventually by somebody................today is eventually....
7
posted on
07/05/2007 11:57:05 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No wonder Mexico is so filthy. Everybody who does cleaning jobs is HERE!.......)
To: AU72
I sense a tsunami building for a federal bailout. No kidding. Guess who get's to pay for this? It most certainly will NOT be the wack-jobs in San Fran.
8
posted on
07/05/2007 11:57:33 AM PDT
by
The Blitherer
(What would a Free Man do?)
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
9
posted on
07/05/2007 11:58:42 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
To: george76
Can't wait to see what happens when every taxpayer gets a bill for $2,000 to pay for lifetime 100% medical coverage for an army of bureaucrats who have retired at 90% of their last year's salary.
Tea. Party.
10
posted on
07/05/2007 11:59:02 AM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Elections have consequences.)
To: The Blitherer
Guess who get's to pay for this What an odd place to put an apostrophe.
11
posted on
07/05/2007 11:59:42 AM PDT
by
The Blitherer
(What would a Free Man do?)
To: AU72
Then who will bail us out ?
12
posted on
07/05/2007 12:00:51 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: randog
So I guess funding weenie replacements wasnt such a good idea?Replacements??? Additions and removals. But I quibble.
The city also pays homeless people $500/month to live there.
For some reason they can't quite figure out why they have a homeless problem...
13
posted on
07/05/2007 12:01:28 PM PDT
by
null and void
(A large gov't agency is more expensive than a smaller agency with the same mission, yet does less)
To: george76
They consider street repairs as “discretionary income”?
I have often thought that politicians are poor stewards of the public infastructure, always cutting maintenance first so they can still fund their more “public” programs (diversity, ribbon cutting, etc). This seems to confirm it.
To: AU72
What do you think national health care is really all about? Like social security, it’s about using yet another Ponzi scheme to shift the burden away from people who should really be responsible for taking of themselves, and putting it on the “collective whole.”
It’s about keeping power by taking away your responsibility to be personally responsible. In exchange for being responsible for yourself, you have to be responsible to the power.
To: george76
Then who will bail us out ?The Senator Reid's undocumented Americans.
16
posted on
07/05/2007 12:03:52 PM PDT
by
AU72
To: wideawake
If the 4.9B liability were a gallon bucket, 500K would be a third of a milliliterAlternatively, it's the equivalent of paying fifty cents on a debt of $4900.
17
posted on
07/05/2007 12:05:15 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: george76
New York City is 10x the size of San Francisco, and has less than two-thirds San Francisco's unfunded pension liability.
On a person-for-person basis, each New Yorker is on the hook for $363 of unfunded pension liabilities, and each San Franciscan is on the hook for $6,533 - a factor of 18.
18
posted on
07/05/2007 12:06:19 PM PDT
by
wideawake
("Pearl Harbor is America's fault, right, Mommy?" Ron Paul, age 6, 12/7/1941)
To: george76
The sooner they go broke the better. I can’t wait until the chickens come home to roost for these socialist assholes and the taxes go confiscatory.
19
posted on
07/05/2007 12:07:13 PM PDT
by
domenad
(In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
To: randog
So I guess funding weenie replacements wasnt such a good idea?LOL. At any given time in SF, there are probably as many people with peni who wished they didn't have them as there are those without who wish they did.
I propose a barter/transplant system that could save the city millions.
20
posted on
07/05/2007 12:08:11 PM PDT
by
keat
(You know who I feel bad for? Arab-Americans who truly want to get into crop-dusting.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson