[skimbell]

I commented in another thread earlier today that we need to pull a page from the lib's book and have our conservative representatives continually propose legislation aimed at reinforcing gun rights. Every time they knock a proposed bill down our reps need to submit another one. That's how they're doing it to us.

We beat an attempt to grab our guns and think it OK. They just come up with another pile of shit the next day and it starts over.

On this regulation, assuming that it passes which I doubt, I'd guess that we'd need stores that specialized in ammunition sales. Probably be few and far between but where there's a demand...

[zeugma]

I commented in another thread earlier today that we need to pull a page from the lib's book and have our conservative representatives continually propose legislation aimed at reinforcing gun rights. Every time they knock a proposed bill down our reps need to submit another one. That's how they're doing it to us.

I was at a 'town meeting' with my congresscritter Sam Johnson, who is generally a fairly conservative guy. During the Q&A part of the meeting, I asked him if he could tell me what the bill number was for any bill he'd proposed or sponsored that would eliminate the 1934, 1968, and/or 1986 victim disarmament acts.

He started sputtering about such a thing not being possible to get passed. I told him I didn't care, and that we should have the gun grabbers wasting their time trying to stop good legislation like this rather than us spending all their efforts stopping their crap. 

Keep in mind that at the time we had a publican house, senate, and presidency. 

Even pols that are fairly decent on the 2nd don't really support it.