Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/03/2007 12:47:34 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


The House bill is HR 2829.

On the Net:

Text of Jan. 18 Executive Order 13422: http:http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/orders


2 posted on 07/03/2007 12:49:27 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... For want of a few good men, a once great nation was lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I’m so unhappy with Bush that I personally don’t want him to have any additional powers. I’m afraid he’d use them somehow to grant a blanket amnesty. That’s what happens when you betray people. They will never trust you again.


3 posted on 07/03/2007 12:52:04 PM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

bump.


5 posted on 07/03/2007 12:53:30 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

It is the executive branch of the government, the president is in charge of the executive branch. It is not a ‘new’ grab for power, but maintaining the assertion that should have been there in the first place.


6 posted on 07/03/2007 12:53:34 PM PDT by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
""This can only further delay implementing health, safety and environmental protections," said Gary Bass, executive director of OMB Watch, a private watchdog group that joined numerous labor and good-government groups, including the AFL-CIO, Public Citizen and the Union of Concerned Scientists, in opposing Bush's order. "

When I see these groups FOR anything I immediately cheer for the other side and I haven't been wrong yet.

8 posted on 07/03/2007 12:55:49 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading the article since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

This sounds like a good thing to me - assert some control over regulatory agencies and also make them justify proposed new rules. Plus, if Loretta Sanchez and the AFL-CIO are opposed, its probably be a good thing to support.


10 posted on 07/03/2007 12:57:54 PM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

President Bush is giving an obscure White House office new powers this month over a wide range of regulations affecting health, worker safety and the environment. Calling it a power grab, Democrats running Congress are intent on stopping him.

Uh, yeah, sorry, this jerk deserves LESS power NOT MORE!

and based on his performance, L’il bush and all who follow him need a whole lot more oversight, not less.


13 posted on 07/03/2007 1:16:16 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson