Posted on 07/03/2007 6:22:07 AM PDT by bocopar
I orginally wrote this as Friday's radio spot script, but I personally like it as a read, so here's both.Last year, I got in trouble with YouTube for trying to air one of my television show segments that included the videotaped beheading of an American captured by Iraqi insurgents. That video was aired all around the Islamic world, yet was kept off our televisions because that was considered inappropriate content. They figured we just couldnt handle the truth.
Earlier this week, I read a story in the UK Sun; a story that we have yet to hear in America. You see, last Thursday night, Friday mornings terror bomb attempt in London was aimed at killing women.
The silver Mercedes was parked in front of a nightclub called Tiger Tiger and was supposed to go off around 2am as patrons were leaving and milling about. Last Thursday night was Ladies Night.
Should the car, full of gasoline canisters, have gone off, many out front would have been incinerated, and the blast would have caused significant damage to the club and those inside. As the injured made their way to what was left of the exits to the responding law enforcement and emergency medical personnel waiting outside, that was when the second car bomb was to detonate.
That car was full of nails and that blast was meant to finish off the injured, the initial blast survivors, and those who came to their aid.
So why, you may ask, would they target women? Because Islamofascists have no use for Western women.
Western women dress provocatively instead of the head-to-toe garb mandated under Sharia Law. Western women are educated, they drive, they have rights and run for public office. In the West, its illegal to beat and even kill a belligerent wife or daughter. Western women are thereby fair game.
So when you Code Pink or Women in Black babes protest the war and state that the terrorists mean us no harm and would leave us alone if not for George Bush, remember this: the Islamic fanatics have no respect, thus use for you. If it were up to them, youd all be in birkas and should you speak out, it would be legal to stone you to death.
When Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of the United States, third in line to the American presidency, went on her unauthorized trip to Syria, she had to wear a headscarf in public. In that part of the world, she wasnt just Madame Speaker. She was still just a woman.
When Democracy Now hostess Amy Goodman broadcast from the Qatar studios of al Jezeera, she couldnt come on looking all scraggly. Instead of liberal chic, they had her all made up because a woman just cant go on television there looking any old way.
And should Hillary Clinton become President of the United States, Ill bet shell have to wear head covering when visiting a Muslim country. To us, shell be the most powerful person in the world. To them, shell be just a woman.
So ladies, youre in this fight whether you like it or not. As far as Islamic terrorists go, every night is Ladies Night.
Arggg, I hate to say it but Hill (future prez, spit) shouldn’t have to bow down and wear any sort of covering for those pigs.
I have only hear this once from the MSM but it seems to be rather obvious that this was their thinking.
“So why, you may ask, would they target women? Because Islamofascists have no use for Western women.”
Pet peeve. She is second in line... unless you consider President Bush as being in line for the presidency...
Hillary would likely claim she was not made to wear the scarf, but was only doing so out of ‘respect’. (projectile vomiting now...)
Obviously a typo. Should have read “Nancy Pelosi, TURD in line...”
And if Bush really WERE president, he’d be actuallyu — you know — protecting the citizens of this country by SEALING THE BORDERS from the invaders.
IF you read the Sun article, you would see that a British terror expert said the bomb was meant for women. Sorry.
“As al-Qaeda sympathisers were seen as the No1 suspects behind the massacre plot, a security source said: They would have known the club would be packed with women.
Western women are viewed as immoral and legitimate targets. They do not cover themselves up like Muslim women and are seen as decadent.
He added grimly: Terrorist groups want to cause maximum outrage. Killing women would cause that.
Around 1,000 revellers were crowded into the Tiger Tiger nightspot when the first deadly device was discovered by pure luck.”
Noted and changed.
I swear some of these groups like code pink that the women somewhere deep inside want to ‘be put in their place’ by men. Like they are seeing how far they can push the limits before somebody does something. Even if that someone is crazed jihadists.
Now that’s what I call editorial customer service!
When I’m wrong, I admit it and make the appropriate changes. No ego here.
Rare... and appreciated.
God bless you.
Thank you for paying better attention to detail than I. Gettin’ old, you know...
Y’know... this is what I love about FR. How often do you get the chance to interact with the author of the article you’re discussing?
Most of them could be bothered.
Secondly and more importantly, with "experts" like these who needs al Qaeda?
Terrorist groups want to cause maximum outrage.
Terrorists do not care about outrage. Nobody dies to cause outrage. They want to kill, and they die to kill as many as possible.
That's what happens in a PC society, where they think about the reaction to terror more than terror itself.
Secondly and more importantly, with "experts" like these who needs al Qaeda?
Terrorist groups want to cause maximum outrage.
Terrorists do not care about outrage. Nobody dies to cause outrage. They want to kill, and they die to kill as many as possible.
That's what happens in a PC society, where they think about the reaction to terror more than terror itself.
Islamofascists have no use for Western women.
I’d rather be a Western woman than an Eastern woman. I’ve seen how they “use” them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.