You may have a point or is this just the Feds stepping in to grab total control?
(No, I don’t think the Feds should be expanding.)
No, this is a clearly misleading article.
When you see that INDUSTRY asked for this in order to make enforcement easier with less complications such as conflicting and contradictory standards, multiple classifications for the same item depending on which agency promulgates the rules, obsolete rules based on 40-50 year old technologies, and some changes that avoid duplications.
Actually, I saw almost nothing that wasn’t already regulated by some agency anyway.
The publishing source should be made to explain its outrageous charges because they clearly didn’t read the government source document.
And admittedly, I only read half to two thirds before I gave up my search for non existent gun grabbing.