Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kellynla

I’m no attorney, but I would think if you give away property as long as you have a perpetual lease, and are then thrown out, then it seems the scouts should have legal recourse to getting their building back?


5 posted on 07/02/2007 6:52:10 PM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: I still care

I’m sure the Council & BSA attorneys are all over this — I wish I knew more about the details of the agreement, but it sounds to me, an interested layperson, that BSA has a good case.

OTOH, it must be more complicated than that, because (IANAL) I think from b-law that buildings (”improvements”) go with the land, and the land was always owned by the city.

I also recall from b-law that transactions involving real estate must be in writing to be enforceable, which makes me wonder why the details of the contract (if one exists) haven’t been made public.


19 posted on 07/03/2007 6:36:25 AM PDT by fgoodwin (Fundamentalist, right-wing nut and proud father of a Star Scout!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson