“Doesn’t sound too ‘hardcore’ to me.”
Happy to leave the porn reviews to you, Montag.
The Cincinnati area prosecutors came to a different conclusion, threatening obscenity charges.
Cincinnati Enquirer: http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2002/08/29/loc_two_more_hotels_pull.html
Looks like we have a moral schism in the FR community. I guess to some, “softcore” is anything you’re watching that happens to somebody else, and “hardcore” is when its you that’s committing adultery/fornication.
Cincinnati prosecutors consider Playboy porn. They seem to spend all their time worried that somebody somewhere is having sex or taking their clothes off. What a waste of time and resources.
So what? Doesn't make the prosecutors right. Nifong came to a different conclusion than we did. The Fed prosecutors came to a different conclusion regarding the Waco survivors than we did. Fitzpatrick came to a different conclusion than we did. Guiliani damned sure came to different conclusions in the Milken case than dispassionate, rational people.
Using a prosecutor's opinion to buttress one's argument only undercuts it. It certainly does not buttress it.
I'm not for Romney at all, but as gcruse says above, socons are their own worst enemies. I think many try to parody themselves as agents provocateur.