“This issue has nothing to do with ‘law enforcement.’ Don’t be so disingenuous.”
Good grief, Smithee. How about doing us a favor and actually reading the thread before making such an inane comment.
Multiple posts upstream, starting in the original itself, regarding the enforcement of federal obscenity laws.
Go read, and come back later.
Go read, and come back later.
Uh-uh, Mr. Smarmy. I don't have the time to read 100+ replies, and I shouldn't have to when you are right here on the thread as I type. You posted the thing, you answer the questions.
Seeing that Romney wants to be Chief LEO but would have only at his disposal FEDERAL agencies, of what FEDERAL law has Marriott run afoul?
Don't give me that compost about "local Cincinnati prosecutors," and don't give me that bull about what "pro-family activists believe" are illegal distribution. You have an indictment to back up your "activists'" quasi-legal opinions?
It looks more like you and your ilk would be forgiving if some of that filthy Romney lucre was thrown your way, as you wrote above in your questions for Mitt:
I don't think it's unreasonable to believe that an offer is being made: Pay up, and this problem will go away. There's a word for this: "Shakedown." Sounds worthy of Jesse Jackson.
("5. Do you feel morally obligated to return to the Marriot Corporation -- or better yet, donate to a charitable ministry such as The Lighted Candle Society that assists the victims of pornography and sex abuse -- whatever percentage of your compensation, if any, from your board service or stock holdings that is reasonably commensurate with the percentage of the company's overall revenues produced by its sale of hardcore pornographic material?)