What hasn’t been explained yet.......
Since Armitage hasn’t denied being the leaker and since Fitzgerald was supposed to charge the person leaking her name, why has Fitzgerald failed to even charge Richard Armitage?
Shouldn’t he at least be charged? I mean, if a crime was committed and all.....
I’m sure someone has written about this but I certainly don’t understand why Fitzgerald didn’t follow up with this. Perhaps he decided it was too difficult to prove if Plame was covert or not so he took the easiest route and called it good. Fitzgerald hasn’t seemed to address whether there even was a crime of leaking. Very strange indeed. Perhaps he will write a book.