If this is accurate, then is not that evidence from the judge himself that he erred in what he allowed the jury to know? Shouldn't the appeal have been upheld?
Does anyone know exactly what the words of the judge were that he denied the jury but utilized in his sentence?
A crime so monumentally egregious, so evil and corrupting, yet Fitzfong never charged anyone with this crime.
Maybe Fitzfong can indict Dick Armitage now?
Do we not have a criminal on the loose?
Hey Fitz, where’s the beef?
You asked “shouldn’t the appeal have been upheld” (because of judicial error). I agree it ought to be, but the appeal process has not concluded. It’s only just begun and in the meantime Scooter was being forced into jail to await its outcome. So no appeal has been either granted or denied...yet.