I am proud of my President today....Sandy Berger gets a slap on the wrist for stealing and destroying classified material and Scooter Libby gets 3 years for different recollections with regards to a he said/he said conversation with a slime reporter (if you want to call Tim Russert a reporter). But what does one expect - Berger is a Dim and Libby is a Republican.
Very good move by the President, but his Administration's earlier "slap on the wrist" treatment for Sandy Burglar raises even more disgust--you know it and I know it.
We shouild name these a Sandy Berger decision. No one who commits a lesser crime than Berger should get a stricter sentence.
“I am proud of my President today....Sandy Berger gets a slap on the wrist for stealing and destroying classified material and Scooter Libby gets 3 years for different recollections with regards to a he said/he said conversation with a slime reporter (if you want to call Tim Russert a reporter). But what does one expect - Berger is a Dim and Libby is a Republican.”
Anytime someone mentions disparity in dispensing justice, I use the two examples you cited. There is no comparison between sincerely having a memory lapse in regard to the content of and the order in which two conversations took place years before and a true criminal who STOLE/HID/RECOVERED/DESTROYED Top Secret documents that, I truly believe, would have been harmful to the clinton administration if presented before the 9/11 Hearing Committee.
I hope that ALL of the people who should have been made to provide sworn testimony during the first trial will be forced to do so during the appeal.
EODGUY