You have a right to remain silent. As for identifying yourself, provide your name. Further invasions of your privacy are government intrusion on your privacy and intolerable and not covered by existing law.
You are not allowed to invent new laws for imaginary solutions when they do not exist. The mantra is “enforce the law”. That is explicitly limited to current law. No new ones.
And you will be paying awards with your taxes, not for flogging.
This “build the fence” plan and “throw out the illegals” plan are not plans at all. “Enforce the law” is no plan at all. You can’t “enforce the law” if you can’t identify the illegals, and . . . the truth is you can’t under current law.
“You have a right to remain silent.”
You have a right to remain silent when being questioned because you are accused of a crime. You do not have a right to remain silent when the police ask you, “Which room is the murderer in,” or “Are you a citizen?”
“You are not allowed to invent new laws for imaginary solutions when they do not exist.”
I am allowed to advocate new laws.
“No new ones.”
Who says? I can push for the passage of any law I like.
“This “build the fence” plan and “throw out the illegals” plan are not plans at all. “Enforce the law” is no plan at all.”
Utter nonsense. Any reasonably competent man could execute those plans in a New Jork minute.
“You can’t “enforce the law” if you can’t identify the illegals, and . . . the truth is you can’t under current law.”
Again, road apples. I could; you could; they could if they wanted to.