Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MplsSteve
From what I've read, FDR forced Wallace on the convention in 1940 over a lot of opposition. In 1944 a lot of the big shots in the party were afraid that FDR would not live out another term so they were determined not to allow Wallace to remain on the ticket. So Wallace's being dropped had less to do with any political skills than with being seen as unsuitable by powerful figures in the party.

Of course his father, Henry C. Wallace, had been Secretary of Agriculture for a Republican President (Harding--continued for a while under Coolidge).

30 posted on 07/01/2007 3:31:26 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Verginius Rufus

Your point is well taken. There was much opposition to Wallace from within the Democrat Party.

What I meant to say (and didn’t explain myself too well) is that Wallace did have a chance to secure the 1944 VP nomination and didn’t act upon it. The book “American Dreamer” by John Culver explains what happened at the ‘44 National Convention.

Roosevelt, in typical fashion, hemmed and hawed to pro and anti-Wallace factions as to whether Henry Wallace would be on the ticket again in ‘44. His comments led both sides to assume that either (a) Wallace would be removed from the ticket or (b) Wallace would be the VP nominee.

Rexford Tugwell said it best about Roosevelt “He had a trick of seeming to listen, and to agree or to differ partly and pleasantly, which was flattering. This was more highly developed as he progressed in his career and it was responsible for some misunderstanding. Finally no one could tell what he was thinking, to say nothing of what he was feeling.”


31 posted on 07/01/2007 4:03:12 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson