Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TrebleRebel

Yes indeed, sir. I’ll take a good old fashioned, unbiased, well constructed X-Ray spectrometer over a couple of shady, deceptive Russophiles every day of the week, and twice on Sunday.


89 posted on 07/12/2007 8:49:33 AM PDT by jpl (Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: jpl

More Meselson frauds for your entertainment and edification:

http://www.fortfreedom.org/y04.htm
Kucewicz is the WSJ’s outstanding writer who revealed the extent
of Soviet research on Soviet biochemical warfare in a brilliant series
of articles in April-May 1984 [AtE Jun 84]. He also reported
convincing evidence that the Soviets had supplied biochemical weapons
to their surrogates in SE Asia, who used them on the recalcitrant
Hmong people and elsewhere. The evidence was revealed in two
outstanding WSJ articles (9/6/85 and 3/31/86), but disputed by the
“liberal” science writers of the New York Times, Science, and others.
A particularly vicious piece palmed off as scientific research was
published in the Sept. Scientific American by Harvard biochemistry
prof Matthew Meselson and two others. Meselson, whose trip to SE Asia
had been financed by the leftist MacArthur Foundation, collected bees’
feces (droppings) far away from any war zone, examined the material by
electron microscopy and other methods, not surprisingly found some
toxins in it, and not surprisingly found no man-made toxins
attributable to Soviet weapons. His trivial and irrelevant
experimental findings were never under dispute; his conclusion
attributing all evidence of Soviet biochemical warfare to bee feces is
little short of scientific fraud.
In 1987 Meselson returned with more false and scandalously
doctored whitewash of Soviet biochemical warfare in Foreign Affairs.
The following article, apart from summarizing the whole issue, also
throws light on Meselson’s sleazy suppression of evidence.

http://www.aim.org/publications/special_reports/NewsStand06-14.html

ARNETT: Meselson says the gas described by the commandos fits the description of sarin nerve gas, which the military calls GB.

MESELSON: You have nausea; you defecate; you urinate; difficulty in vision; difficulty in breathing; then convulsions; then paralysis; and then death. All rather quickly.

Then:

http://www.cnn.com/US/9807/02/tailwind.johnson/
CNN retracts Tailwind coverage

Defense Department spokesman Ken Bacon reacts to CNN’s retraction
July 2, 1998

(CNN) — Cable News Network on Thursday retracted its story that the U.S. military used nerve gas in a mission to kill American defectors in Laos during the Vietnam War.

The story was broadcast June 7 on the CNN program NewsStand. CNN Interactive also carried the report.

The Pentagon said it was pleased by the 54-page CNN retraction.


90 posted on 07/12/2007 9:01:15 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson